This is the sixth post in a series of posts looking at the Sermon on the Mount. I’ve referred to a blog by Michael L. Westmoreland-White which brings up these specific points; he in turn credits John Howard Yoder and Glen Stassen. Westmoreland-White describes “dodges” to the Sermon on the Mount, ways in which people seek to get around applying it today. We’ll look today at the last dodge in the group: the “all that matters is the atonement” dodge. (I might note that he is specifically discussing pacifism, so his comments at times focus on how the Sermon is applied at a national level)
To some degree, I addressed this last dodge on Friday. Some feel that any talk of how Christians should live somehow cheapens Jesus’ sacrifice and turns Christianity into a works-based-salvation religion. I probably don’t have a lot to add to what I said on Friday; I strongly encourage you to read that post to understand my rejection of that outlook.
I will restate however that Jesus did not die to give Christians a free pass to live as they please. He died to allow men to be holy, men who can’t make themselves holy on their own. The proper response to such a sacrifice is loving obedience, not out of a desire to justify ourselves, but out of a desire to please the One who died to make us holy.
In the Old Testament, God marveled at the fact that His people couldn’t understand this point, that they would respond to His love and mercy by turning their back on Him. Maybe this is seen most graphically in the book of Hosea, where Hosea marries a woman who is continually unfaithful to him, with this relationship symbolizing the relationship between God and His people. Today God expects a similar loving response from the bride of Christ, not out of fear of divorce, but out of a loving desire to please her husband.
I have a few more thoughts on the Sermon on the Mount, but we’ve finished looking at Westmoreland-White’s article. I’d like to hear your reactions.
I would concur with this, as has been stated before by you, Tim, on Friday, that life change/struggle must take place (and will in those who are His). Holiness is something that is too often left off of our preaching/teaching. As Ephesians 1:4 says, those in Christ were predestined to be in Him to “be holy and blameless before him.” Holiness!
However, it is true that “only the atonement matters” in regards to the ground of our salvation/justification. Again, an important distinction which you have made before and that I’m thankful for. From that ground, “you will know them by their fruit.”
Grace be with you –
Jr
Tim I agree with what you have said in your post. Allowing all of us to share Christ to others is paramount to the Christian movement. But, knowing when to approach others, understanding the point at which a person shares beliefs with others who don’t share the same beliefs can be intimidating. Going to church for you reafirms one’s faith.
Being involved in social church functions is another, bible study is yet another. It all speaks very clear and loudly about your walk. But for me, not so much. So in summing up my comment, what you say is obedience is not necessarily how I see someone being obedient. That is what is so great about protestantism. It allows for individual freedoms unlike for instance the Catholic church rich in tradition, dogma and silly doctrine…..Grace to all