I signed up to review books for Thomas Nelson. That means I receive books from them for free in exchange for reviewing them. Looking over the books they had available, I chose The Sacred Meal by Nora Gallagher (which means I received it for free; this is my attempt at full disclosure).
I chose the book because I have been studying the Lord’s Supper over the last few years. I thought this book would be about that. It is. Well, kind of. I feel sort of like a European that gets invited to a football game in the States, only to discover that the sport isn’t the one he is familiar with. What Gallagher describes is not the Lord’s Supper I know from my Church of Christ background. This is Holy Communion. It exists in a world that is foreign to my Christian experience, with priests and altars, people eating wafers and drinking from chalices. It was an interesting insight, but a frustrating one at the same time.
As an author, I’m sensitive to not wanting to be overly critical of someone else’s work. Yet I also feel a responsibility to do my best to present an honest evaluation of what I’ve read. If I’m being too hard, so be it. Write it off to just another grumpy reviewer.
More than being about the supper, this book is about community and fellowship, a description of the author’s experiences in church. That’s not bad in itself, but it’s sad that this book is supposed to be part of a series about “Ancient Practices.” There is a cursory nod to the biblical background, but Gallagher’s interest is in modern practices, not ancient ones. Biblical history is given a cursory nod, but little more than that. Gallagher’s statement that “We have known for some time that the Gospels were written long after the death of Jesus and were compiled by men who lived long after him” reveals a person who has spent little time examining current biblical research. What “we have known for some time” was disproved decades ago, so her attempt at intellectual snobbery comes off as mere ignorance.
Still, I did gain some insights into human nature and more than a few thoughts about what participating in the Lord’s Supper can mean to Christians. In an age where personal experience often trumps research, Gallagher’s book may well find an audience.
I do have to lodge one more complaint. Are there no proofreaders at Thomas Nelson with a rudimentary knowledge of Spanish? Words like “Sanctuario” and “communidades” are painful to read. Either write them in English or in Spanish, but not a mangled version of the two.
If you’d like insight into how Holy Communion is practiced in the Anglican church, this book can shed some light. If you’d like to know more about the ancient practice of the Lord’s Supper, you’d do better to read John Mark Hicks’ Come To The Table.
I have Fasting by Scot McKnight and The Liturgical Year by Joan Chittister from the Ancient Practices series. Thanks for the heads-up not to get this one! :)
Does she not even interact with the Fathers? Their writing on Holy Communion sounds far more interesting than her late-modern musings.
She breezes through ancient church history a bit, but it’s a quick trip.
Tim, thanks for the review. I think Scot McKnight’s “Fasting” is the strongest book in this series–I recommend it to anyone in my congregation who wants to know more about this practice–I think it’s the best treatment out there right now.
That’s a fair warning not to buy her book! Of the books I’ve read on Communion, I would say JMH’s is the best. I also heard him lecture on it at Pepperdine one year and it was excellent.
Thanks, Matthew, for the recommendation. I’d like to read a good book on fasting. Richard Foster’s treatment in “Celebration of Discipline” is the best I’ve read to date.
Grace and peace,
Tim Archer
Greg, I have to admit that I was comforted to see that most reviewers are saying the same thing. I think this is one of the cases where a successful writer is given a chance to write something outside of her area of expertise.
Grace and peace,
Tim