Category Archives: Church

Church websites: Forget the bells, skip the whistles

6 Replies

There are so many cool features that can be added to a website. There are wondrous visual effects, slick technical tricks, amazing feats of audio-visual magic. Most of it adds little to a website and much of it actually hinders its functionality.

A site needs to be visually attractive; there are some church websites that scream 1995 when you open them, with the little animated icons and boxy layout. There are others that are so visually overwhelming that its next to impossible to find any real information. Every time you move your cursor, something new pops up at you. Videos are running on both sides of the page, with a slideshow moving across the middle.

And please, PLEASE, get rid of the splash page. You know, that landing page that has no real content on it. There was a moment in time when that was appealing. But those three minutes and 40 seconds have passed. People don’t want to go to your site, then have to click to actually get to any real content. They want to read something now. Reports show that people become impatient if a page takes more than a second to load, and if it takes over 10 seconds, they’ll usually go elsewhere.

Never lose sight of the fact that, when it comes to church websites, content is king. People want information. Yes, like I say, an ugly website can create a bad impression. But a website that won’t load because they don’t have the SnazzMaster™ plugin on their computer also creates a bad impression.

Think about our technology. Why are mp3s so popular? Because of their quality? No. Because of their accessibility. Why do newscasts now show cellphone videos? Because of the high def picture they produce? Nope. Its because the information can be had now. In many ways, the text message is a huge step backwards. But it’s become the dominant communication form for a whole generation. Is it pretty? Not at all. No bells. No whistles. But it works, right now. That’s what you want on your website. Something that works. Right now.

Or do you see it differently? I’d like to hear your experiences with websites in general and church websites in particular.

Church websites: thinking about members

2 Replies

Members need quick access to church information. At the same time, churches don’t want to publish all information to public; today’s world has raised new security concerns.

If your church feels the need to make some members’ info available on the web but only to certain users, there are several approaches. The basic approach is to have certain sections of your site visible to all, but accessible only with a password. I’d deem this the least attractive. People can become suspicious of “No Trespassing” signs on a church website; just what are they hiding? Maybe most people understand this, but since there are other solutions to this problem, I don’t see the point in possibly offending your visitors.

Another tack is to set up a separate site for members. This can be done in many ways; a lot of churches use Facebook for their members, posting private information in a closed group on that site.

More and more, it’s becoming easy to assign different levels of users on a site. Members sign in and are able to see parts of the site that are otherwise invisible to other users. To me, that’s a more elegant solution. I’d love to hear how your views on this issue.

Here are some basics that members need:

  • A calendar of events. It’s easy to set up calendars today. I recommend using Google Calendars, but there are lots of options. A good calendar will not only tell you when and where, but also provide a map to the location, have contact info for the organizers, etc.
  • Contact info for church leaders and event organizers. Make sure the church phone number is readily available as well.
  • Access to recent bulletins. This is especially helpful to those who travel over the weekend and to shut-ins.
  • Sermon downloads. Once churches had an active tape ministry. Little by little, the download is replacing that.
  • Links to ministries that the church supports. If you support missionaries, non-profits or other ministries, your members should have any easy way to get more info about those efforts.

Beyond that, there is much you can add: photos, discussions, blogs… What are some of the things you can think of? What can a church offer on its website that would be of special help to its members?

Church websites: thinking about outsiders

1 Reply

It seems to me that we often focus too much of our attention on the “look and feel” of a church website and don’t spend enough time thinking about the content. While I’m not advocating an ugly website, I think that the majority of our planning needs to be focused around what we’re going to say.

Let’s think about outsiders first. We need to consider our website content from the point of view of someone who knows absolutely nothing about our church. That means we need to include the basics, like address (including city and state!), contact information, and meeting times. Those things are pretty basic, but it’s surprising how many church sites lack one or the other of these vital facts.

From there, you want to give them an insight into who you are. Describe your beliefs and your mission. Provide an overview of the different ministries that go on at your church. Tell with some detail what a visitor can expect when they visit your assemblies. It can really help to have a photo of a service, so that they can have an idea of how formal or informal the dress is. Actively seek to avoid “Christianese,” that church jargon that only makes sense to insiders.

Find someone in your congregation with a good feel for writing and proofreading. Have them look over everything. While your writing doesn’t have to professional, you don’t want it to look sloppy, either.

In another post, I’ll talk about making your site member friendly. But for now, let’s talk about non-members. What things should we be providing them on our church website? What things should we avoid?

Let’s talk about church websites

8 Replies

Back in 1996, we were making arrangements to open an annex of an existing language school. One of the things that I decided to do was to put up a website. Admittedly, I was a bit ahead of my time in Argentina; Internet use was not yet widespread there. Still, I felt there would be some prestige in having a website.

There weren’t a lot of design programs available to me. I ended up buying a book on HTML and coding the site “by hand.” It was far from beautiful, but it was functional. And it allowed us to advertise that we had a website, a mark of prestige at that time.

Things have changed greatly, but the need to have a website is still there, especially for churches. And there are lots of tools to make having a website a reasonably simple process. I want to spend some time over the next few days discussing church websites.

As we begin, let me ask you: what do you look for in a church website? What would you hope to find there? What shouldn’t be on a site? What advice would you give to a church that doesn’t have a site or that is looking to redo its site?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Startling words for the modern church

9 Replies

I read an article on Ben Witherington III’s blog the other day that I thought was worth sharing. Witherington posted the text of the address which President Timothy Tennent gave at the September Convocation of Asbury College. I thought it outstanding, and obviously Witherington did as well.

You can read the full text of the speech, titled Our Mission to “theologically educate”, online. (Witherington called it: “The Clarion Call to Watered Down (sic) Evangelicalism”) Let me cite a few quotations that I found interesting:

  • Evangelicalism is awash with the constant drumbeat message of informality, the assumed wisdom of consumerism, reliance on technology, love of entertainment, pursuit of comfort, materialism and personal autonomy – all held together by easy-to-swallow, pithy gospel statements.
  • Evangelicals are, of course, masters at dodging any criticism that we ourselves could ever be co-opted by culture. We disguise our lack of theological reflection by our constant commitment to “relevance” or saying that we are reaching people “where they are.”
  • If we spent as much time really immersing ourselves into apostolic orthodoxy as we do trying to capture, if I can use Tom Oden’s phrase, “predictive sociological expertise” on the latest cultural wave coming, our churches would be far better off. We have accepted almost without question certain definitions of success and what a successful church looks like. However, we must not forget that, as I told this past year’s graduates, if the cross teaches us anything, it is that God sometimes does his greatest redemptive work under a cloak of failure. Only sustained theological reflection is able to penetrate and unmask the pragmatic, market driven assumptions which largely go unchecked in today’s evangelical churches.
  • No one set out to cheapen the gospel, diminish God’s holiness or downplay the cost of discipleship. It’s just happening. A baseball cap here, omitting the word “wretch” from Amazing Grace there. The pressure to bring in new members made it best to just drop the required confirmation class for membership. Besides, people are just too busy to attend a new members class and it might hurt our annual membership goals. The call to career missions slowly became short term missions which slowly became vacations with a purpose. It all happened so seamlessly. We brought in a new youth director. He doesn’t have any biblical or theological training, but, oh, how the youth love him. You should see the new worship leader we have! He doesn’t know any theology, but he’s just picking the choruses each week, and he can really play the guitar! You see, it happens in ten thousand small skirmishes, rarely in any big, bloody battle.
  • Evangelicals have become experts in finding a thousand new ways to ask the same question, “What is the least one has to do to become a Christian.” That’s our defining question. We’ve become masters at theological and soteriological minimalism. We are the ones who have boiled the entire glorious gospel down to a single phrase, a simple emotive transaction, or some silly slogan. It is time for a new generation of Christians, committed to apostolic faith, to declare this minimalistic, reductionistic Christianity a failed project! It is wrong to try to get as many people as possible, to acknowledge as superficially as allowable, a gospel which is theologically unsustainable.
  • We have, in effect, been criss-crossing the world telling people to make God a player, even a major player in our drama. But the gospel is about being swept up into His great drama. It is about our dying to self, taking up the cross, and being swept up into the great theo-drama of the universe! Christ has come as the Second Adam to inaugurate the restoration of the whole of creation by redeeming a people who are saved in their full humanity and called together into a new redeemed community known as the church, the outpost of the New Creation in Adam’s world. Discipleship, worship of the Triune God, covenant faithfulness, suffering for the sake of the gospel, abiding loyalty to Christ’s holy church, theological depth, and a renewed mission to serve the poor and disenfranchised – these must become the great impulses of our lives.

Tennent had a lot more to say. It’s a long piece, long for a blog, anyway. But it’s worth your time to read it, even if you don’t agree with all he has to say.