Category Archives: Citizens of heaven

What are we pledging? 2

Well, you’re not much help! Just kidding. Since no one advanced any ideas about just what is being pledged, let me propose a few:
Literally we are pledging loyalty. Since the pledge was developed in the years following the Civil War in an attempt to unify the country, I’m guessing it was especially directed at southerners who still might feel resentment about the war.
I think that obedience is implied. That’s admittedly the part that scares me a bit. To some extent, the pledge is saying: “I will do what this country asks of me.”
To what extent are we pledging our loyalty? Some have said, “As long as the nation is under God.” How do we determine that? If we see that the government has done immoral things, do we stop being loyal? Let’s use the classic example: Nazi Germany. At what point would the country have lost your allegiance? Or would it have?
Can you picture Christians saying a pledge of allegiance to Rome? In any form? The Romans had a simple version of the pledge. It said: “Caesar is Lord.” Christians directly attacked that statement, countering with “Jesus is Lord.”
I’ve got some more thoughts, but I’d like to hear yours first.

What are we pledging?

I enjoy reading Al Maxey’s Reflections. I don’t always agree with him, but he always makes me think. He recently wrote about a subject that fits with what I’ve been talking about lately. Al wrote about the appropriateness of saying the Pledge of Allegiance. I’ve written some on this before. (see I Pledge Allegiance) My teaching in the last few years has been that, when we say the Pledge of Allegiance, we are always placing an asterisk at the end of the pledge. We pledge allegiance with the understanding that allegiance to God comes first. We pledge allegiance as long as the nation remains under God.
But now I wonder about that even. Just what are we pledging? What are we promising to do? I guess this is sort of like an oath, and oaths make me uneasy anyway. But I especially worry when I’m not even sure what I am pledging. What does it mean to be loyal to the flag and to the country? Up to what point? In what ways?
When I got married, I made a pledge to my wife (pledging her my troth, for those that like the old language). I understand what those vows involve. I’m not sure what these vows involve. And I’m not sure that I’m altogether comfortable with making a promise to an earthly kingdom. But I’m more than willing to learn, so please enlighten me with your views. Just what’s being pledged?

Alien life

The New Testament repeatedly tells us that we are aliens on this earth, part of the Diaspora, the scattering of God’s people. What does it mean to live like an alien?
And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth.” (Hebrews 11:13)
I was an alien in Argentina for 15 years. I know what that was like. It was hard to not to want to fit in, to be just like everyone else. I never fully lost my accent, never fully lost my foreign ways. I never stopped hearing that question, “Where are you from?” There was something about me that told people that I wasn’t like them.
People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own.” (Hebrews 11:14)
I wish my spiritual accent were as strong as my Texan accent. I wish that people could tell from hearing me speak that I’m not satisfied to be here, that I’m looking for a country, a heavenly one. I want to live in such a way that people will say “Where are you from?” I don’t want to fit in, don’t want to just be one of the gang.
When I lived in Argentina, I was a responsible neighbor, obeying laws and paying taxes. I tried to do what was right by those around me (even those guys that would sit on the sidewalk and play music full blast for 48 hours straight). Yet I wasn’t Argentine. I couldn’t hold office. I couldn’t vote. I wasn’t from there.
If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one.” (Hebrews 11:15-16)
Do you suppose that Abraham wore a t-shirt that said “Native of Ur and proud”? Did Ruth flaunt her “Moabite University” in her neighbors’ faces? Would Paul have taught all of his converts of the wonders of Tarsus? Do you think the apostles tried to get elected to the Sanhedrin?
There was a time when God’s people had a physical territory here on earth. They could speak lovingly of Zion, where the temple stood, of lovely Jerusalem, the capital of the Israelite kingdom. This was not mere nationalism, at least when correctly understood. This was about the Promised Land, the covenant land. It was a sign of their relationship with God. It was the center of their worship to God, at least the temple was. It didn’t just happen to be their homeland.
The New Testament compares the Promised Land not to a place in this world, but to the land of rest, our eternal sabbath with God. We don’t put down roots here; we let people know that we long for a better country. We are on our way to a heavenly country.
Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.” (Hebrews 11:16)
The city that God has prepared for us isn’t Washington D.C. It’s not New York. It’s not even Abilene. God has called us to be citizens of heaven, to inhabit the kingdom of heaven. When people live with that awareness and show it to the people around them, God is not ashamed to be called their God.
That’s my kingdom. That’s where my citizenship lies. That’s why I’m not as concerned about this election as many are. Certainly I recognize that what happens with the kingdoms of this world can affect my kingdom. I’m told to pray for the government, not for the welfare of any earthly kingdom, but in order for there to be peace that we may spread the gospel. It’s quite possible that we may face what the Israelites faced in Egypt, when a pharaoh arose “that did not know Joseph.” God’s kingdom prospers under adversity more than it does under peaceful conditions. I don’t pray for persecution, but I recognize that it is part of my discipleship. Politics and politicians will never determine my spiritual well-being.
I want to regain my spiritual accent. I want people to understand that no, I’m not from here. I want to live a life that looks forward to a heavenly country, not backwards to an earthly one. I want to live in such a way that God will not be ashamed to be called my God.

Good citizenship

Philippi was a Roman colony. People born in Philippi were Roman citizens by birth, and they were proud of the fact. I’m guessing that “I’m proud to be a Roman where at least I know I’m free” was a popular song.
When Paul writes the Philippians, he keeps this fact in mind. In Philippians 1:27, he asks them to “live citizenly” [politeuomai; to behave as a citizen, as Strong’s says], a phrase he connects with the gospel of Christ. Then in Chapter 3, Paul brags about his heritage and the things that he has left behind as a Christian. Interestingly enough, in his bragging, he doesn’t mention Roman citizenship, something the Philippians would have put at the top of the list. Still, Paul includes it in the “everything” that he now counts as rubbish for the sake of knowing Christ. Then comes the stinger. Paul writes: “Their mind is on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven.” (Philippians 3:19-20)
You’re proud to be Romans, Paul says, but I want you to live as proud of the gospel. When I list the most import things in my life, I don’t even list Roman citizenship, and even the things I list are things I no longer value. They’re like garbage compared to my Christianity. How much less do I value that citizenship? That’s because we have a new citizenship: our citizenship is in heaven.
I’m wondering how well that went over in Philippi.
I know how well it doesn’t go over here.

Politics, the Lamb’s way

I find myself time and again going back to Revelation 5. I wrote a post about this chapter a while back, but I’d like to look at it again, this time seeing what the passage tells us about politics. If you remember, that passage is key to understanding Revelation, and I think gives insight on the whole New Testament. The apostle John is in the throne room of God, looking at a sealed scroll that no one has sufficient security clearance to open (my paraphrase). Then he is told that the conquering Lion of Judah, the Root of David, can open the scroll. This is kingly language. Lion of Judah. Root of David. Triumph. That sounds like a hero to stand up to the persecuting Roman empire. That’s what these suffering Christians need. That’s how they can overcome Rome. Power!

Then John turns and sees a lamb. Not just a lamb, but a lamb with its throat slit. A sacrificed lamb. What happened to the lion? Where’s the king? Where’s the power? The Lamb has seven horns, sign of perfect power in biblical terms. Still, this lamb was slain. Then we are told the unthinkable, as the inhabitants of heaven sing to the Lamb: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain…” Because you were slain. The Lamb conquered by dying. By being sacrificed.

And so John introduces us to the politics of the Lamb. How was the church going to overcome Rome? Not by meeting sword with sword but by meeting sword with bared neck. They would conquer by being faithful unto death, that is, by laying down their lives. They would triumph with blood, not ballots nor bullets. They were to stand up to the Roman empire, but not with violence, social agitation or noisy protests. They were to faithfully proclaim the Word of God, being faithful witnesses, following in the footsteps of the One who testified to Pilate and Herod by letting them nail Him to a cross. “It is enough for the student to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master.” (Matthew 10:25)

How would we today have dealt with the Roman empire? Maybe we could get Christians into influential positions at a local, national and international level. Work through the political system. Let influential members speak with their friends in high places. Or we could imitate the Jewish sicarii and let our weapons do the talking. It’s an evil empire, so armed resistance is justified. Everyone knows all that stuff in the Sermon on the Mount wasn’t really meant to be put into practice.

But that’s not what we see in Revelation Chapter 5. The Lion is a Lamb. Triumph comes through sacrifice, power expresses itself in meekness. The Lamb’s chosen way is not easy. We’d rather be called to overcome through military strength, to wield political power, to use society’s tools to change society. We want the Lion, not the Lamb. But victory comes not through wielding the sword but through yielding to the sword.

How do we live out the way of the Lamb in the 21st century?