Category Archives: Citizenship

Seeking A City

“These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city.” (Hebrews 11:13–16)

This world is not my home I’m just passing through
my treasures are laid up somewhere beyond the blue
the angels beckon me from Heaven’s open door
and I can’t feel at home in this world anymore.

The Case for Non-Participation: Citizenship

The strongest argument for non-participation has to do with a Christian’s citizenship. It’s a case I’ve made before, but I feel strongly enough about it to address it again. To be honest, I think that a true understanding of citizenship limits a lot of the nationalistic expressions and patriotic stances that I see in Christians in the United States.

For many, there almost seems to be a conflation of the Kingdom of God and the nation of the United States. (“God bless the U.S.A.” is less about God and more about the U.S. A.) What’s good for the U.S. is good for God. That attitude runs contrary to what I see in the Bible, where Christians are to live as strangers and aliens, seeking a heavenly city rather than an earthly one.

No man can serve two masters. No one serving as a soldier in the Lord’s service should be distracted by the “civilian affairs” of this world. You can’t be an ambassador of one nation and full-fledged citizen of another.

We are citizens of a nation that spans all earthly borders, includes all nations and races, speaks every earthly tongue. The good of every person on this earth is our business. The welfare of every nation on earth is our concern. Our main prayer is that we be able to lead quiet lives, able to spread the good news of God’s reign.

I don’t see how serving in the military of any one country can fit with that stance. Again, I’m in no place to condemn those who make a different choice. But I know that growing up, I never heard this teaching. I thought patriotism was a natural part of Christianity and military service a necessary part of patriotism. My aim is to help others at least recognize that they are making a choice, one that can have powerful consequences.

Making a Case For Non-Participation

I’m going to shift terms a bit. Since the term “pacifism” brings up many different images in people’s minds, I’m going to focus for now on non-participation, that is, Christians abstaining from military service. I’ll try and lay out some of the reasoning in today’s post, then work on the individual ideas over the next few days.

First, and foremost for me, is the subject of citizenship. That’s a major topic on this blog, one that some grow tired of. I don’t tire of speaking about it, because I see so much confusion around me on the topic. The saying: “The Bible says that we should be good citizens” rarely goes unchallenged. (I agree that the Bible says we should be good citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven, but that’s rarely what the person making such a statement is talking about). I believe that when discussing the idea of citizenship, the saying: “No man can serve two masters” fully applies. As a citizen of the Kingdom of Christ, I can’t afford to become entangled in the affairs of another kingdom.

The second topic that comes into play is that of the powers behind the nations of this world. We too often buy into a Western point of view, a sort of dualism that separates the physical and the spiritual. That’s not a biblical world view. Though God uses and limits the kingdoms of this world, they are under Satan’s rule. I’m fully aware of how that sounds to Western ears; I’m asking us to try and see things from a different world view, what I think is a more biblical world view. In the Bible we see a direct relation between spiritual powers and the nations of this world.

The third topic has to do with Jesus’ specific teachings which place limits on the use of force. Obviously this is included in the first point, for if we are members of Christ’s Kingdom, His teachings about how to live in that Kingdom apply to us. While He did not come to contradict the Law, He did come to redefine much of it. His words “You have heard it said… but I say…” were part of a re-envisioning the Law. Where vengeance was once part of the code, forgiveness has replaced it. Where there was once a defining of “neighbor” and “enemy,” Christ applies love across all lines. Where the limit was once the taking of life, now Christ even forbids anger and hatred. I’ll even include here what Paul says about leaving all revenge to God. (And the teaching of Revelation, as discussed last week)

A practical consideration has to do with the deceit and trickery that surrounds modern government and modern warfare. Somehow we seem to be so aware of this element when it comes to matters of domestic policy, yet are willfully blind to it in military matters. Attempts to peek behind the curtain are labeled “bashing America” or being unsupportive of our troops.

That should be enough to start the discussion. I’ll probably add more as the discussion goes. But those general areas should be enough to get us started.

Pirates & Passports

I’m looking forward to this evening. Carolina, Andrea and I are going to see “Pirates of Penzance” at ACU tonight. I really enjoy listening to Gilbert and Sullivan, and I’ve never seen the entire show of “Pirates.” I’m already laughing at the jokes, and the show is still 12 hours away!

Getting into the mood, I was humming a little Gilbert and Sullivan this morning, albeit from “H.M.S. Pinafore.” It was the song “He Is An Englishman” The part I was remembering was:

For he might have been a Roosian,
A French, or Turk, or Proosian,
Or perhaps Itali-an!

But in spite of all temptations
To belong to other nations,
He remains an Englishman!

Maybe I’m remembering that because I was at a citizenship ceremony on Tuesday. Carolina was naturalized as a citizen of the United States. We went to Dallas (OK, Irving) for the 8:30 a.m. ceremony, which is a lovely time to be facing the traffic in the Metroplex.

If you’ve read much on this blog, you can imagine that I had mixed feelings about the whole thing (If not, you can read some of the articles in the “Citizens of Heaven” category). Basically, Carolina was looking to simplify her passport situation. Her Argentine passport has her maiden name on it, while all of her documentation from here has her married name. There was just too much explaining to do with all of it.

As the time for the ceremony drew near, I realized that I was thinking of my mixed feelings, but hadn’t really talked to Carolina about hers. So the night before, I asked her how she felt about the upcoming ceremony. “A bit sad,” was her reply. I hadn’t thought about that aspect, the feeling of being called on to “renounce” your prior citizenship. I reminded her that this was just a technicality, that as far as Argentina was concerned, she would remain Argentine.

So naturally, one of the first things they did at the ceremony was ask people to stand at the naming of their “former nationality.” [insert face plant] Then there was the oath, which begins by declaring that the person is renouncing all allegiance “to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty.” [I couldn’t help thinking that maybe we should include that when we baptize someone!] The oath also calls for a willingness to aid in warfare, though it seemed to leave the door open for noncombatant and conscientious objector status.

When we came out of the ceremony, Carolina said to me, “Now I’m like you.” I said, “No, now you’re like the kids. I’m the only one in the family who only has one passport.” [Maybe someday they’ll come up with a better system, maybe a universal passport of some sort.]

I know that there is a big part of Carolina that will remain an Argentine, just as there is a part of me that retains loyalty to nations of this world even as I claim my true citizenship, my heavenly one.