Category Archives: Latin America

A brief, over-simplified history of Latin America: The Spanish-American War

I’ve left out important parts of this story, particularly as regards Central America. We’ll pick up some of that along the way, but I want to keep pressing forward in time. At the end of the 19th century, Spain’s empire had been decimated; among the few remaining holdings, the most important by far was Cuba. Cuba had always been key to Spain’s American colonies and, as such, had received a disproportionate amount of attention and investment from the Spanish Crown. Cuba came to be seen more as a province of Spain than a colony.

When the Monroe Doctrine had prohibited European powers from colonizing in the Americas, Cuba was “grandfathered” as were Puerto Rico and other Spanish holdings. As pressure mounted for the building of some sort of canal that would link the Atlantic with the Pacific, the U.S. become concerned about being able to control the seas.

Naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan argued that whoever ruled the seas would rule the world, and he pushed the U.S. to establish strategic bases in the Caribbean and in Hawaii. The Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Theodore Roosevelt, was a great admirer of Mahan and actively lobbied for the U.S. to expel Spain from the Americas.

At the same time, José Martí, the leader of the Cuban independence movement strengthened ties with the United States, seeking support (and arms) for the coming revolution. Many Americans were sympathetic to Martí’s requests for aid, some wanting the U.S. to annex Cuba, others seeking freedom for the island.

As the unrest turned into open rebellion, Spain responded cruelly. They moved residents of the island into concentration camps, thereby cutting the supply lines of the rebels. People in the United States were outraged. The pressure for U.S. intervention continued to grow. Journalists Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst published story after story documenting the atrocities of the Spaniards and the valor of the Cubans. Some of what they wrote was even true.

Finally a truce was negotiated between Cuba and Spain, and Cuba began functioning as an autonomous state on January 1, 1898. Then on February 15, the U.S.S. Maine exploded in Havana harbor. Studies as to the cause of the explosion have never been conclusive, but the public was convinced that Spain was behind the plot and pressured the administration to take military action.

Congress passed measures recognizing Cuban independence, renouncing all intentions of annexation and authorizing the President to take any military measures necessary to free Cuba from Spain. Spain took offense and declared war on the U.S. on April 23; the U.S. responded in kind on April 25. The war, which lasted four months, was fought in the Pacific and the Caribbean.

The U.S. gained most of Spain’s colonies, including the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico. The question arose as what to do about Cuba. Annexation was now out of the question, yet the U.S. had no intention of allowing the island to determine its own course. The answer was the Platt amendment. The Platt amendment restricted Cuba’s ability to establish relations with other nations, to obtain loans from foreign entities and other such matters. It granted the U.S. the right to intervene in Cuban affairs when deemed necessary. It also called for the establishment of a permanent U.S. naval base on the island. (i.e., Guantánamo Bay)

Understandably, the Cubans rejected the Platt Amendment outright. However, Washington soon made it clear that there would be no independence for Cuba if they did not accept the terms being offered. Finally, the Cubans decided that freedom with some restrictions was better than remaining under military rule.

Cuban revolutionary leader Juan Gualberto Gómez stated:

To reserve to the United States the faculty of deciding for themselves when independence is menaced, and when, therefore, they ought to intervene to preserve it, is equivalent to delivering up the key of our house, so that they can enter it at all hours, when the desire takes them, day or night, with intentions good or ill. If it belongs to the United States to determine what Cuban government merits the qualification ‘adequate’… only those Cuban governments will live which count on its support and benevolence.

His words would prove prophetic, not only for Cuba, but for all of Latin America.

A brief, over-simplified history of Latin America: The Monroe Doctrine

John Quincy Adams is considered to be one of the prime supporters of the concept of manifest destiny. As Secretary of State under James Monroe, Adams crafted a document known as the Monroe Doctrine. It basically warned all foreign powers that any colonization of territory in the Americas would be considered as aggression against the United States.

It was a watershed moment in U.S. foreign policy. The United States was claiming the right to intervene anywhere in the Americas if foreign powers were involved. Later, Teddy Roosevelt would expand the policy to allow the U.S. to intervene in the case of “flagrant and chronic wrongdoing by a Latin American Nation.” That gave the U.S. the right to address internal issues in other nations as well as external influences.

These policies put the United States in the role of policing the Americas. They would lead to numerous military interventions as well as countless covert operations. Though John Quincy Adams didn’t achieve his expansionists goals in Latin America, his dream of regional domination lived on long after him.

A brief, over-simplified history of Latin America: Manifest Destiny

It’s time to start relating the history of Latin America with the history of the rest of America. Early on in the 19th century, the concept of manifest destiny was popular in the United States. It was the idea that God had ordained that white people should spread democracy from the Atlantic to the Pacific, then from Canada to Argentina. In other words, the entirety of the Americas was destined (manifestly) to become a part of the United States.

Even as the actual “manifest destiny” idea died out, the idea of unifying the Americas did not. No treaty and no concept of human rights could keep this movement from achieving their heaven-decreed goal. Lie, swindle, murder and steal… as long as you’re doing it for the advancement of this heavenly cause, it’s okay. Especially if those that you are abusing are not white.

This idea came to a head in the 1840s. War broke out with Mexico, and Congress was divided over the ultimate aims of the war. Some felt that the only way to have lasting peace was to annex the entirety of the Mexican state, and they based their arguments on the concept of manifest destiny. However, other proponents of manifest destiny opposed the move on the grounds that the inclusion of Mexicans in the United States would hurt the purity of the nation. John Calhoun pronounced in Congress:

[W]e have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind, of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race…. We are anxious to force free government on all; and I see that it has been urged … that it is the mission of this country to spread civil and religious liberty over all the world, and especially over this continent. It is a great mistake.

Eventually, the country settled for the acquisition of over half of Mexico’s land. Almost 15% of present day United States was part of Mexico prior to 1836 (the Texas revolution).

The land was obtained, but the idea of manifest destiny would not survive. The debate during the war had split the movement, and it would never recover.

A brief, over-simplified history of Latin America: Wars of independence

Bolivar and San Martín

The reign of the Bourbons in Spain had created a time of political unrest in the Americas. The Bourbons rolled back many of the political gains that the colonists had made, appointing officials from Spain to occupy key governmental posts in the New World. When Napoleon displaced the Bourbon king in 1808, setting off the Peninsular War between Spain and France, many people in the Americas felt that time had come for them to be independent of the Crown.

Though many could be named, the two most famous leaders of the independence movement were Bolivar (Simón José Antonio de la Santísima Trinidad Bolívar y Palacios Ponte y Blanco) and San Martín (José Francisco de San Martín).

Bolivar’s family came to Venezuela in the 16th century. He attended military school as a boy and studied in Spain as a teenager. He returned to Venezuela in 1807 and soon joined the fight for independence. His leadership skills quickly earned him the name El Libertador (the Liberator). He was the commander of the forces that won freedom for the northern part of South America, and he was instrumental in the establishment of the nation of Gran Colombia (a state covering much of modern Colombia, Panama, Venezuela, Ecuador, northern Peru, and northwest of Brazil), serving as the first president. He hoped to create a federal union, modeled on the United States, but was unsuccessful in unifying the nations. He eventually declared himself dictator to try and preserve the union, but his efforts failed.

Bolivar resigned in 1830. His famous statement “All who served the Revolution have plowed the sea” reflected his intention to move to Europe, as other revolutionary leaders had done. However, he fell ill before embarking and died in December of that year. Hugo Chavez has long affirmed that Bolivar was poisoned by “New Grenada traitors,” and even had a forensic expert study Bolivar’s bones. The expert said that Bolivar could have died of arsenic poisoning, but the results were inconclusive.

In the south, it was San Martin that led the charge. San Martin was born in Argentina, son of a Spanish soldier. His father returned to Spain when San Martin was very young and San Martin was raised in Spain. After a successful military career in Spain, including campaigns in the Peninsular War, San Martin returned to South America and joined the independence movement. Why? Historians have offered various opinions, but San Martin never stated his motives.

San Martin first fought against the Spanish in several battles in Argentina, then led his army across the Andes to engage the Spanish in Chile and Peru. The crossing took more than a month and was carried out under extreme hardship, but the move was decisive in defeating the royalists. Winning decisive battles at Chacabuco and Maipú, San Martin eventually forced the Crown to recognize of Chile. San Martin later joined with Bolivar’s forces to obtain Peruvian independence, though San Martin was eventually forced to resign from the army in deference to Bolivar’s power.

San Martin returned to Argentina. During the ensuing Argentine Civil Wars, San Martin attempted to stay neutral. He eventually moved to Europe, where he died. Eventually his remains were taken to Buenos Aires and placed in the Cathedral of that city. Because of his neutrality during the internal struggles in Argentina, he was seen as a controversial figure for many years, but is now regarded as the supreme national hero in Argentina.

A brief, over-simplified history of Latin America: The Battle of Havana

The significance of the Battle of Havana (1762) has been greatly overlooked, in my opinion, when considering the forces that shaped the Americas. Spain’s dominance of the seas had been broken at the Battle of Gravelines during the Anglo-Spanish war at the end of the 16th century. However, their dominance over the waters around Central and South America remained unchecked until the Seven Years War (also known as the French and Indian War; I call it the first world war, since it was fought over 5 continents (and the Pacific theater) between all of the major military powers of the Western world.

When the King of Spain saw the coming conflict with Great Britain, he knew that he had to take steps to hold onto Cuba. Cuba was the gateway to the Americas, the port through which Spanish fleets entered and exited the region. Plus, whoever controlled Cuba controlled not only the Caribbean but also the Gulf of Mexico.

Carlos III of Spain sent Juan de Prado as commander in chief of the forces in Havana. The priority for De Prado was to fortify the elevated area above the Morro castle; the Morro controlled all access to the Havana harbor. Due to negligence and the scourge of yellow fever, this work was never completed. That would prove to be the downfall of the Spanish forces in Cuba. When the British came, they were able to capture this high ground, bombard the castle, and eventually breach its walls.

Here’s the description of the aftermath, taken from Wikipedia:

On 14 August the British entered the city. They had obtained possession of the most important harbour in the Spanish West Indies along with military equipment, 1,828,116 Spanish pesos and merchandise valued around 1,000,000 Spanish pesos. Furthermore, they had seized 20% of the ships of the line of the Spanish Navy, namely Aquilón (74), Conquistador (74), Reina (70), San Antonio (64), Tigre (70), San Jenaro (60), África (70), América (60), Infante (74) and Soberano (74), together with 3 frigates, 9 smaller vessels and some armed vessels belonging to trading companies (Compañía de La Habana and Compañía de Caracas). Furthermore, two new almost-completed ships of the line were seized in the dockyards – San Carlos (80) and Santiago (60 or 80).

It’s hard to exaggerate what a blow this was to the Spanish interests in America. While the British returned Cuba (in exchange for Florida), the damage had been done. Besides the material damage, the demonstration that the Spanish forces could be defeated would embolden the independence movements in Central and South America. Over the next 60 years, Spain would lose all of their holdings in the Americas, except Cuba and Puerto Rico.

The Spanish dominance of the Americas ended with the Battle of Havana.