Category Archives: Lord’s Supper

Breaking Bread—Acts 2:46

“And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts,” (Acts 2:46)

For all of those willing and able to set me straight on all of this about breaking bread in Acts, please feel free to comment on the last few posts. I’m trying to figure out how we decide when “breaking bread” in Acts refers to the Lord’s Supper and when it refers to a common meal. In the last post, I asked for help with Acts 20:7. Lots of people believe that this is one of the most important verses in the Bible; it consistently makes its way into tract after tract, proving that the Lord’s Supper must be taken every Sunday and only on Sunday.

So what do we do with this verse? Acts 2:46. It’s threatened my Sunday-only mindset, so now is the time for people to bring me back to orthodoxy.

In Acts 2, the brand-spanking new church is meeting in the temple. They apparently aren’t holding their church assemblies in homes nor church buildings. It would have been very difficult, if not impossible, for thousands of them to take the Lord’s Supper together in the temple. They would have met together in the temple, then separated into individual homes to take the Lord’s Supper… just like this verse describes! Don’t let the fact that it was in homes get in your way.

The best evidence also indicates that the early church took the Lord’s Supper in the context of a meal (yes, I know that’s debatable; feel free to give evidence to the contrary, just don’t say “as 1 Corinthians 11 says,” unless you’ve found something new in that passage). So the “received their food” wouldn’t be out of place, either.

What makes us conclude this passage is not about the Lord’s Supper? Please don’t be shy about giving reasons. I honestly, sincerely, truly want to know. If you know someone who knows reasons why Acts 20:7 is the Lord’s Supper and Acts 2:46 isn’t, please send them here. I consider this an important point and would truly appreciate any insights toward resolving this.

Breaking Bread in Acts 20

Acts 20:7   On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight.

How many doctrines hang on this verse? I can think of several (okay, maybe not on this verse alone, but much literature cites this verse when speaking of these doctrines):

  1. Sunday as the day of meeting.
  2. Lord’s Supper every Sunday.
  3. Lord’s Supper only on Sunday.

I’ll continue asking the question I’ve asked in the last two posts: how do we know this is the Lord’s Supper, over against, for example, Acts 2:46? That seems like a pretty important thing to me, especially considering the weight we’ve hung on this one verse. There’s got to be some people that read this blog that believe this verse refers to the Lord’s Supper and teaches the things I list above. Will no one step forward?

Breaking Bread in Acts, II

I’ll be out of the country until next Tuesday, but I wanted to try to spur some more discussion on this. Let’s simplify it. Give me your view on the following passages:

(1) Acts 2:42   And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.
A. Lord’s Supper B. Common Meal C. Could be either

(2) Acts 2:46 And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts,
A. Lord’s Supper B. Common Meal C. Could be either

(3) Acts 20:7   On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight.
A. Lord’s Supper B. Common Meal C. Could be either

(4) Acts 20:11 And when Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten, he conversed with them a long while, until daybreak, and so departed.
A. Lord’s Supper B. Common Meal C. Could be either

(5) Acts 27:35 And when he had said these things, he took bread, and giving thanks to God in the presence of all he broke it and began to eat.
A. Lord’s Supper B. Common Meal C. Could be either

Breaking Bread in Acts

Keep those pitchforks sharp and those torches burning… but save them for a week.

In the meantime, help me with this study. Here are the passages in Acts that refer to “breaking bread.” How do we decide which ones are the Lord’s Supper and which ones are a common meal?

Acts 2:42   And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.

Acts 2:46 And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts,

Acts 20:7   On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight.

Acts 20:11 And when Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten, he conversed with them a long while, until daybreak, and so departed.

Acts 27:35 And when he had said these things, he took bread, and giving thanks to God in the presence of all he broke it and began to eat.

Drinking Covenant Blood

It’s my own fault that I never noticed it. It’s easy to say, “Nobody ever pointed that out to me growing up,” but experience tells me that I don’t always capture everything that people are trying to teach me. Add to that the fact that this point is clearly pointed out in Scripture, and I have to take the blame.

You see, when talking about the Lord’s Supper, I always thought that the bread represented the body and the cup represented the blood. And I was almost right. It’s just that my understanding of the cup was more than a little shallow.

Let’s read what Jesus says the cup is:

Matthew 26:28 “for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.”
Mark 14:24 “And he said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.””
Luke 22:20 “And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.””
1 Corinthians 11:25 “In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”””

It’s not just blood, it’s covenant blood. My best guess is that however Jesus said it in Aramaic, the words “covenant” and “blood” were so related that the order could be inverted in the tradition without really changing anything. And the words would have resonated deeply with a Jewish audience, for they were familiar words. They were words spoken centuries before by Moses:

Exodus 24:8 And Moses took the blood and threw it on the people and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant that the LORD has made with you in accordance with all these words.”

It’s not just blood, it’s the blood that ratifies the covenant. As the Hebrew writer says in Hebrews 9:15-27, it is the blood that not only brings us salvation and forgiveness of sins, but also inaugurates the era of the new covenant. We’re not just remembering a death; we’re remembering a covenant! It’s not just blood, it’s covenant blood.

Think about that, and take this covenant-blood blessing:

Hebrews 13:20-21 Now may the God of peace who brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, the great shepherd of the sheep, by the blood of the eternal covenant, equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in us that which is pleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and ever. Amen.