Tag Archives: Baptism

What hinders me?

eunuchHe’d made a journey of over one thousand miles in a chariot. One thousand hot, dusty miles. He was an Ethiopian who had converted to Judaism and made the trip from his homeland to Jerusalem to worship. He had traveled all the way to Jerusalem to visit the temple. And he when he got there, he couldn’t get in.

You see, this man was a eunuch. He had been castrated. According to the Law given to Moses, no man in that condition could enter the temple. One thousand miles, to be told “No” at the door. Maybe he knew that. Maybe he had accepted his fate before going, being willing to just gaze on God’s temple from the outside. We don’t know. Still, it had to be more than a bit frustrating.

Now he’s reading in the book of Isaiah as he travels back home. That in itself is amazing, giving the scarcity of books in ancient times. He must have paid a good bit of money to have his own personal copy of a portion of Scripture. Maybe someone had recommended Isaiah to him; Isaiah 56 had to be a favorite among eunuchs, where we read these verses: “For this is what the LORD says: “To the eunuchs who keep my Sabbaths, who choose what pleases me and hold fast to my covenant— to them I will give within my temple and its walls a memorial and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that will not be cut off.” (Isaiah 56:4-5) Someday, they would have a place within the temple.

But this eunuch wasn’t reading that chapter. He was reading chapter 53—“He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken.” (Isaiah 53:7-8) Such words would have spoken to him, especially after his trip to Jerusalem: oppressed, afflicted, without descendants. The words intrigued him. When Philip appeared alongside and asked him if he understood what he was reading, the eunuch readily admitted that he didn’t.

Philip explained the passage to him, explained the good news of Jesus. Somewhere in that good news, Philip mentioned baptism. Baptism. New birth. A new start. A new life. But the eunuch knew what was coming, so he asked the question: “Here’s water. What hinders me from being baptized?” Go ahead, Philip. Tell me the bad news. I’ve already faced it at the temple. I’ve faced it for years. Tell me what it is this time. I already know. This good news isn’t for eunuchs. What hinders me? My mutilated body. Or my nationality. Or… what is it this time?

Maybe the answer went unspoken. Maybe Philip shouted with joy, “Nothing! Nothing at all.” Maybe the eunuch could see it in Philip’s grin or the look in his eyes. Maybe the tradition that the King James quotes is actually true. Whatever it was, the eunuch learned that there was no hindrance this time, no barrier, no “No Eunuchs Allowed” sign. His path was clear, clear to the water, clear to new birth and new life, to the cleansing Jesus offers. “What hinders me?” Absolutely nothing.

I can’t help but think of the words from the beautiful old hymn: “My path to life is free.” Amen! What hinders me? Nothing. Nothing at all.

Temples of God: Receiving the Spirit

cloudsOK, I didn’t forget that I was going to get back to the subject of the Spirit. I don’t promise anything earth-shaking nor definitive, but I’ll share some of what I’ve come to see in the Bible.

I believe that when we are baptized (Acts 2:38; 5:32) Christ/the Spirit/the Spirit of God/the Spirit of Christ/the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead (Romans 8:9-11) comes to live in us (1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19; 2 Corinthians 6:16; Colossians 1:27; 2 Timothy 1:14).

For reasons that I don’t fully understand, some have tried to explain away this reality, either saying that the Spirit only works through the Word and doesn’t indwell or by saying that the Spirit only indwells us through the Word (and no, I don’t fully see the difference in those two arguments). I believe that Jesus Christ comes to live in us through the Spirit, helping us to live the way God desires us to live. Let us give thanks to God that he saw fit to make us his temples, leading us to be ever holier, day by day.

A framework for understanding New Testament miracles: Baptized with the Spirit

337522537_ebc4a82409Another area of confusion in studying the Holy Spirit is the subject of being baptized with the Holy Spirit. I guess this is one of the areas where Douglas Jacoby’s work got me to looking at a new interpretation that I hadn’t considered before. You can read his views here:

http://douglasjacoby.com/view_article.php?ID=1438

The article isn’t as long as it looks; for some reason it is repeated on the same page. Jacoby credits Richard Rogers with having taught this view before he did. You can also read it in this article from Restoration Quarterly from the 1970s:

http://www.acu.edu/sponsored/restoration_quarterly/archives/1970s/vol_21_no_4_contents/terry.html

The basic thrust is this: the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and being baptized with the Holy Spirit describe the same event from two different points of view. God pours out, mankind is immersed. Compare it to you pouring water into a glass that contains a stone: for you, the action is pouring, but the stone sees it as being covered by the water.

Some observations:

  1. The promise from John the Baptist should be considered: “Matthew 3:10 The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. 11     “I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.  12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire.” Note that John talks about one who wil baptize with the Spirit and with fire. In the preceding verse, fire refers to judgment. In the verse that follows, fire refers to judgment. The natural reading would be to interpret “fire” in verse 11 as judgment. So Christ will baptize with the Spirit and with a condemning fire. It would make sense that all men receive one or the other; you are either baptized with the Spirit or you will be baptized with fire. This interpretation of “baptized with the Holy Spirit” fits what John said.
  2. Being baptized with the Holy Spirit is mentioned in Acts 1 as occurring soon; Acts 2, which seems to be a fulfillment of that promise, is when Peter refers to the outpouring of the Spirit. It makes sense for both to refer to the same event.
  3. No one is told to seek nor expect to be baptized with the Spirit after Acts 2. That is, no Christian is told that they still need this baptism. It is stated as having occurred (1 Corinthians 12:13), but nobody is told that they lack this baptism.
  4. When the Spirit came on Cornelius and his followers, Peter remembered the promise of being baptized with the Holy Spirit. The Spirit “came on” Cornelius as it had the apostles in the beginning, and that reminded Peter of the promised outpouring. That’s when he realized the Spirit had been poured out on all mankind, just as Peter himself had said back in Acts 2.

Several passages connect being baptized with the Spirit with our baptism in water: John 3:5, Titus 3:4-6. That’s also the most logical understanding of 1 Corinthians 12:13. When we are baptized in water, we are born of water and Spirit, we enjoy the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Sprit. We are immersed into the poured-out Spirit, baptized in him if you will. By our baptism in that one Spirit, occurring when we obey (Acts 5:32, Acts 2:38), we are brought into the body of Christ, baptized into Christ as the Bible says (Romans 6:4; Galatians 3:27). We experience the benefits of the outpouring of God’s Spirit which occurred the day of Pentecost, in Acts 2.

Sent not to baptize…

Recently, another brother wrote the following in his blog:

How do we deal with the fact that Paul wrote—
(1 Cor. 1:17) For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel — not with words of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
For all the many scriptures that support the traditional position of the Churches of Christ, there is no explaining this passage in light of what we’ve traditionally taught. How can the greatest evangelist in history say — by inspiration — that Jesus did not send him to baptize?
Don’t we send our missionaries out to baptize? Don’t we expect reports from them as to numbers of baptisms? Can you imagine a Church of Christ missionary saying that he wasn’t sent to baptize?

I expressed disagreement in my comments and would like to address the subject here. As one who has been a missionary and is often in missionary situations today, I echo Paul’s statements. The act of physically putting someone into the water is not what I was called to do. I will do it when necessary; as recently as March I baptized several people. But I am not looking for notches on my revolver nor feathers in my headdress.

I preach that people need to repent and be baptized into Christ for the forgiveness of sins and to receive the Holy Spirit. [I, for one, feel that repent is as much a part of what leads to that result as be baptized is.] However, I have seen the dangers of people being baptized by the visiting celebrity preacher. I’ve heard them say, “I’ve got the photo that shows I was baptized by _____.” It’s a danger that we need to work harder to avoid; part of that would happen if we quit giving “credit” to the person who physically immerses the other. It doesn’t matter who puts the person under the water. Look at John 4:1-2:

“The Pharisees heard that Jesus was gaining and baptizing more disciples than John, although in fact it was not Jesus who baptized, but his disciples.”

Paul preached baptism as part of faith in Christ; we see that in Acts 16. He says in 1 Corinthians 12 that all of the Corinthians have been baptized, so that wasn’t the question. In chapter 1, Paul is dealing with the problems that had arisen based on preacheritis in Corinth: I follow Paul, I follow Apollos, I follow Peter. He says, “I am thankful that I didn’t baptize many of you.” Note what he doesn’t say:

  • He doesn’t say: “I am thankful I never taught you to be baptized.”
  • He doesn’t say, “I am thankful none of you was baptized while I was present.”
  • He doesn’t say, “I am thankful none of you were baptized because of my preaching.”

He says, “I am thankful that I didn’t physically put many of you under the water, for that would have added to this preacher cult problem you have.”

Remember… context is our friend. Out of context, we can use Paul’s words to say that he didn’t highly emphasize baptism or that he separated baptism and faith, placing faith above baptism. In context, all we can say is that Paul did not feel compelled to be the one to physically immerse someone. He would teach that person that they needed to be immersed, but it did not have to be by his hand.

Personally, I hope that more of us learn that lesson. Someone asked me the other day, “Who baptized you?” I do know the man’s name, but there was no real significance to his participation. He was the deacon in charge of our youth camp. I don’t know that I ever heard him teach a lesson. I don’t know where he is today. And I’m glad.

Who really baptized me? The Holy Spirit, thank you very much. Someone helped me be immersed so that He could do that work.

I would encourage all missionaries to say “I was sent to preach, not to baptize.” I would encourage it of all preachers. We do baptize and will baptize. But we care more that the person be baptized rather than whether or not we do it by our own hand. We learned that from Jesus’ own example and Paul’s words here.