Tag Archives: B&B Friday

Book review: Deceiving Winds

Bruce Morton graciously sent me a copy of his book Deceiving Winds: Deceiving Winds – Christians Navigating the Storm of Mysticism, Leadership Struggles & Sensational Worship. He did not request a review; he merely sent me the book to share his views with me.

Morton’s book sets out to study the influence of the religion’s of Ephesus on the church in that city. In particular, he studies the worship of Artemis and Bacchus as reflected in the letters of Ephesians, 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy. The book is an excellent resource for anyone wanting to gain insight into this facet of these letters; the endnotes and bibliography make up almost one third of the book.

Where Morton loses his way is when he turns to exegesis. He has taken some issues that he feels deeply about and made them the primary concerns of these letters. Primarily, he is discussing feminism and instrumental music; the backdrop of these pagan religions allow him to work these topics into passages throughout these epistles.

In an analysis of some statements from Seeking a Lasting City (Love, Foster, Harris), Morton states, “The apostle is not talking about the whole of apostolic teaching and Christian doctrine. Instead, he is talking about specific Christian doctrine and the false teaching his readers have heard.” (p. 155) This critique of others’ work aptly fits Morton’s study as well. He takes teachings addressed to a specific situation in Ephesus and tries to apply them to all Christians throughout all times. By making such a strong case about the background of these letters, he has weakened the modern application of the passages he’s studying. For example, if the reference to not being drunk in Ephesians 5 only refers to the worship of Bacchus, then it says nothing to those who would drink outside of a religious context or even outside of the context of Bacchus worship.

Basically, what Morton tries to do is relate all of the emerging church movement, as well as the teachings of progressive members of churches of Christ (which are two very different things!), to these ancient religions. This doesn’t work, because shared practices do not mean that two religions are the same. That is, the fact that the Ephesian religions used instruments and modern churches use instruments does not make their worship the same. If that were true, the modern church would have to cease many of its practices; a good study of New Testament backgrounds shows that much of what Christianity does is not unique to Christianity.

Morton also errs in making general statements which reflect his feelings, but have no objective support. For example, when discussing those who have decided that instrumental music should be excluded from Christian worship, Morton declares, “The conclusion represents a commitment to the divine character and authority of apostolic teaching and the New Testament as a whole.” (p. 92) The implication, of course, is that those who disagree share no such commitment.

Another troubling practice in this book was the use of quotations to support things that the original writer did not have in mind. For example, in the section on singing, Morton quotes numerous individuals who praise the value of singing. How many of those people would have limited their comments to a cappella singing? Few, if any. But Morton presents them as if they strengthened his case against the use of instruments in the modern church.

As I said, as a study of the background of Ephesians, 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy, this book is an excellent resource. (I’m puzzled as to why so little time was spent in addressing the letters of Revelation 2-3, which went to people facing the same religious influences in the same geographic area). As to application, rather than an exegesis of passages within those books, Morton has basically provided us with a series of rants* about the things he doesn’t like in the modern church.

 

*[Edit: January 12, 2012 — It’s been called to my attention that the word “rant” is misused here. Rant implies a degree of emotion and vehemence which is not present in Morton’s writings. I often misuse the word in my own speech and writing to refer to something that is written with the sole intent of criticizing. The dictionary definition of the word is different from my usage.

Note: I received this book for free, with no obligation to write a positive review. The links in this post are for an associate account with Amazon.

Simply Christian by N.T. Wright

I’m way behind in my reading, so I haven’t done any book reviews in a while. I have been remiss, however, in not mentioning a book that I used this past semester at ACU: Simply Christian by N.T. Wright. It’s an attempt to present some extremely deep theology in simple terms. I was fooled by the easy-to-read style and pushed my students through the book at a fairly quick pace. It’s easy to read, but processing the ideas takes some time.

Wright points to four universal longings, four things present in all of humanity that he refers to as echoes of the divine. These are: longing for justice, longing for spirituality, longing for relationship and longing for beauty. Wright then uses these four themes throughout to tie together the biblical story (as fulfilled in Israel and as fulfilled in Christ) as well as our reaction to it.

Wright also spends time talking about the relationship between heaven and earth. He speaks of three options. The first option is seeing heaven and earth as being identical, as seen in pantheism and panentheism. The second option is to see heaven and earth as completely separate, view reflected in Epicureanism in the ancient world and Deism in the modern world. The third view, in Wright’s words, is that “Heaven and earth are not coterminous, in this option. Nor are they separated by a great gulf. Instead, they overlap and interlock in a number of different ways.” (Location 942 in the Kindle edition)

All of this theology doesn’t remain up in the air; Wright brings it to life in the last section of the book, describing how Christians are to live out the realities of the Kingdom. I can’t do justice to all of the material contained in this book, but I do want to recommend it highly. Just don’t be fooled, as I was. You may be able to read it quickly, but you’ll miss a lot by doing so. This is a book to be read and contemplated at a leisurely pace.

Rethinking Mission Work

On Fridays, I sometimes recommend other blogs that I think have some especially worthwhile reading. I want to steer you over to Mark Woodward’s blog today. He has done an insightful series called “Rethinking Mission Work.” It’s an analysis of how we in the churches of Christ have selected and funded missionaries and mission efforts. I don’t agree with everything he says, but I do find the discussion to be very timely. You can find the series here:

Besides reading the blog on Mark’s site, you can join in on a post-by-post analysis of this series which Jay Guin is leading over on his site. You’ll find more discussion on Jay’s blog:

Happy reading, folks!

For those keeping score at home, I lifted the image straight from Mark Woodward’s blog.

Short-term mission resources

I have a lot of hesitancy when it comes to short-term missions. Seems like everyone is doing them these days. Some churches have basically replaced long-term missions with short-term ones, which is a mistake, in my opinion. Many short-term efforts end up being little more than group vacations for those that go. While education isn’t always the answer, it can’t hurt, either.

That’s why I was pleased to find a number of resources from David LIvermore. He’s written several books on Cultural Intelligence that are generally helpful. He also has a book called Serving With Eyes Wide Open which is specifically about short-term missions.

While buying the book would be an excellent idea for everyone involved in short-term missions, there are resources on Livermore’s site that can be read for free. At the bottom of the page about this book, there are a number of articles. I especially recommend:
Leave Your Baggage at Home
Ten Things I Hate About STM
Head Over Heels for Short-Term Missions

We’ll get back to our pacifism discussion next week. Happy reading!

B&B Friday: CYOD Bible

As a kid, I really enjoyed the old “Choose Your Own Adventure” books. They were sort of like a game inside a book. You would read to a certain point, then be presented with a choice, something like: “If you choose to explore the old mine, go to page 71. If you choose to go back to the lake, go to page 42.” There were all sorts of stories and lots of imitations, but the books were great fun.

That’s why I was intrigued when Luddite Press asked me to review their new electronic version of the Bible, the Choose Your Own Doctrine Bible. You won’t find them in stores; Luddite Press only publishes e-books. But it’s worth hunting them down and exploring the other cutting-edge titles that they offer.

The Choose Your Own Doctrine Bible is based on the God’s Word Translation of the Bible. It is designed to help the reader avoid confusion when faced with possible interpretations of a text. All you have to do is choose which doctrine you want to believe, and the hyperlinked text will lead you right to the appropriate passage. For example, you find this is Romans 10:

” 9 If you declare that Jesus is Lord, and believe that God brought him back to life, you will be saved. 10 By believing you receive God’s approval, and by declaring your faith you are saved. 11 Scripture says, “Whoever believes in him will not be ashamed.”

If you want to believe in salvation by belief alone, go to John 6:47.

If you want to believe that baptism is necessary for salvation, go to Acts 22:16.”

(I wish I could format the quote in a way that you could appreciate the layout. It’s very elegantly done, with all the advantages of modern typesetting).

I think you can see the usefulness of this system. No more having to think about what others might believe; you can easily lock yourself into one belief system and stay there.

My one complaint, I guess is that this system can still be confusing for those who haven’t yet been told what they are supposed to believe. I’m thinking that it would have been more useful to have the passages coded by denominational group (Catholic, Baptist, etc.) or overarching belief system (Calvinist, Arminian, Neo-Platonic Gnostic, etc.). I can see how that would greatly complicate the system however. Just within the churches of Christ, we would need several different threads. I could see, for example, something at Acts 20:7 that says, “If you walk the old paths, go to 1 Corinthians 16:2. If you are a progressive change agent, go to Acts 2:46.”

I don’t think I’ll be using this Bible for my own personal use, but it’s an intriguing concept. You should take a look at it. If you’d like to see a video demo of the Choose Your Own Doctrine Bible in action, you can see one here.

For other reviews that are participating in this blog tour, follow this link.

I was in no way compensated for this review nor required to offer a positive review.