Tag Archives: Bible study

The process of learning to study the Bible

On Tuesday, I had a scheduled phone call with Gailyn Van Rheenen. Gailyn heads up Mission Alive, working with church planting teams. He wanted to share some thoughts on discipling that he thought could be useful to the Cuban church.

Gailyn shared some things he had learned from a book called Building a Discipling Culture by Mike Breen and Steve Cockram. As I reflected over some of what he shared with me, I realized one concept had a lot to say about our topic this week. (Yeah, I know… I should have realized in time to write this post yesterday. So sue me.)

Gailyn talked about four stages in discipleship, which he described as:

  • Unconsciously Incompetent: The new convert doesn’t realize all that he doesn’t know. Enthusiasm reigns.
  • Consciously Incompetent: Here’s where someone becomes painfully aware of their limitations. It’s at this stage that many reversions occur.
  • Consciously Competent: People know how to do what they need to do and tend to be very aware of the process of doing those things.
  • Unconsciously Competent: People reach the point where doing what needs to be done becomes second nature.

I’m not sure if that’s an adequate description of those categories, but maybe you get the idea. I can see this applying to some degree to Bible study. There’s the initial stage, the pick up the book and read it stage. “It says what it means and it means what it says.” When growth occurs, people become aware of the fact that Bible study is much more complicated than they thought. For some, the daunting nature of good Bible study will make them throw up their hands in despair; others will be motivated to learn and move on to the next stage. That next stage involves going through the necessary steps of Bible study until they become second nature. That’s the final stage. A man like N.T. Wright may not go through the steps of exegesis that a graduate student goes through, but he uses the concepts and tools because they have become an unconscious part of who he is.

The problem is, we’re afraid to move people to that second step. We know that we needed it in our own lives, that moment of “wow, I don’t know how to do this” that drove us to learn how to study. We know the richness that comes from a deeper study of God’s Word. But we hate to make people realize they don’t know how to study God’s Word. Instead of a necessary step in the maturation process, it feels like arrogance on our part: I know this and you don’t.

We accept it in other fields. Someone may be very good at arithmetic, but they have to accept that their professor knows calculus better than they do. Gifted athletes never reach the highest level until they understand that other people can teach them techniques that will improve their performance.

We also need to remember that the more we learn, the more we realize that we don’t know. I can say, “This isn’t as easy as you might think” because I know what a challenge it is for me. I know how far I have to go, after all these years.

So, to put it bluntly, we can’t be afraid to show people their lack of knowledge… as long as we’re willing to help them learn the skills they need to improve. Maybe we need to spend more time on teaching Bible study skills and hermeneutics and less time presenting pre-processed applications.

What do you think? Does this process make sense, either as a view of the discipling process or the process of learning to study the Bible? Do you agree that we’re afraid to show people the fact that they don’t know how to study the Bible? Do you have any suggestions as to how we help others move along this process and how we further our own progress?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Photo by Alvimann

Why some people don’t like educated preachers

Diploma and mortar boardIn thinking about how people love “quick and easy” Bible study, as we discussed yesterday, it’s easy to see how an anti-intellectual spirit can grow in our churches.

Joe Churchmember reads “Abstain from all appearance of evil.” (1 Thessalonians 5:22), and he can understand it: don’t do anything that looks bad. Then new preacher Dr. McSmartypants comes in and says that passage is talking about testing the spirits (holding onto what’s good, avoiding every form of evil) and Joe Churchmember feels like Dr. McSmartypants is taking a simple passage and making it confusing. He may even say, “I shouldn’t have to have a college degree to understand your sermons!” [Interesting note: my spell checker flags “Churchmember” but not “McSmartypants”]

I think that also explains the popularity of topical preaching. In a topical sermon, the preacher can string together “easy” verses, not having to wrestle with context, culture, linguistics or any of those other things. He can say, “We put money in the collection plate EVERY Sunday because 1 Corinthians 16 says ‘Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him'”, and the whole congregation will nod in agreement.

When I was in college, one of my friends told of having been rebuked by an older member for not using the King James Version. The reason? “We didn’t lose arguments back when we used the King James.” Says something about the strength of the reasoning behind those arguments.

So how do we convince people to have the patience to do serious Bible study? How do we encourage them to read the Bible, while still saying, “You can’t always take a text at face value”? How do we make the Bible accessible to the masses while maintaining intellectual integrity?

Any suggestions?

Photo by Mary Gober

Piety isn’t always pithy

People like quotes. Short little sayings that quickly convey an idea. We like to be able to refer to something Tolstoy said without actually having to read Tolstoy’s works!

In the business world, the idea of the “elevator speech” is popular, where you can explain some project in 30 seconds or less.

We like our religion the same way. We like short take-away expressions, like “Love your neighbor as yourself” or “I can do all things through Christ.” It’s easier to deal with the Bible at that level than to actually have to work through concepts like genre, context, linguistics, etc.

In my opinion, it’s why many people like the book of James. “It’s so practical,” they say. What they mean is that they can read a verse and seek to apply it, without working through the things I mentioned above. (That leads to lots of mistakes, of course, but it is definitely quick and easy)

Piety isn’t always pithy. Biblical concepts can’t always be explained in 30-seconds or less. Not every principle can be explained during an elevator ride. Not every problem can be solved by throwing a proof text at it.

Some things are as quick and easy as they seem. When Jesus tells us what the two greatest commandments are, that’s fairly straightforward… even though it would take us a lifetime to work out all the implications. But many other concepts only get distorted when reduced to a verse or two out of context.

We have to be willing to take the time to work at understanding the Bible. Yes, it does make it harder to explain to outsiders and beginners. That doesn’t change the facts of the matter. Quoting “I think, therefore I am” doesn’t explain Descartes. It doesn’t even describe the existential crisis and healing process around that phrase. The same happens with the Bible.

If it weren’t that way, God would have given us a religious quote book and left it at that.

 

 

 

photo from www.creationswap.com

The best study on the subject

How many times has someone recommended a book or an article to you, saying, “This is the best study on this subject that I’ve found”? What do people mean when they say that?

Sometimes the person means that they held a different view prior to reading the study, but found the thoroughness and persuasiveness of the article to be so strong that they changed their view.

In a few rare cases, they mean that the author has done careful research and presented it extremely well, even though the reader remains unconvinced.

More often than not, it seems to me, the person means, “I found someone who agrees with me and expresses it well.”

What do you think? On what criteria should we judge the quality of a study of a biblical issue or text?

The dangling verse

The other day, someone wrote to a discussion list and asked what a particular verse meant. The smart aleck in me almost won out; I was very tempted to write, “Nothing.” I guess that’s a little extreme, but a verse read completely out of its context means very little.

Some would point out that the New Testament writers often quoted verses out of context. That’s true, but it pays to remember that people at that time tended to know much more Scripture than we do today. Like the Jewish people today. Ray Vander Laan tells of attending a Jewish school where the professor would quote a verse, and the students were expected to quote the preceding and following verses. To a large degree, people would tend to hear verses in context.

I do recognize that at times passages were used out of context by the New Testament writers. Though this was their practice (and that of many Jewish teachers at that time), I don’t think we’re justified in doing the same.

I recently read an article at BibleStudyTools.com with the title: “Never Read A Bible Verse.” I like that title. In the article, the author encourages people to always read, at minimum, an entire paragraph, rather than a verse.

It hasn’t helped, of course, that many King James and American Standard Bibles (among others) print each verse as a separate paragraph. I can’t help but think that has encouraged people over the years to take verses by themselves, rather than in context.

Nor has the old style of preaching helped, where preachers would spout dozens of verses during the course of one sermon, almost none of them given with any context at all. I grew up thinking that Paul’s letters were like the book of Proverbs, isolated sayings with little to no connection between them. I was greatly surprised to discover they actually presented a flowing thread of arguments and reasoning.

If you missed them, commenters yesterday provided some excellent examples of out-of-context passages (I think Randall won the prize for most outrageous). Feel free to add to the list in the comments on this post.