I’m going to be spending some time over the next few days looking at the book The Next Christians by Gabe Lyons.
The third and final section of Lyons’ book may be the most controversial. He refers to a theory espoused by Phyllis Trickle in her book The Great Emergence in which she argues that Christianity undergoes a major shift every five hundred years. In about the year 500, the Roman Empire found. Near the year 1000, the Roman Catholic church split from the Orthodox churches. Close to 1500, the Reformation took place. Following this trend, Christianity is due for a change.
Lyons feels that these Restorers that he’s been describing, these Next Christians, are going to fundamentally change the face of Christianity. The driving force behind this, he reasons, will be a return to the preeminence of the gospel. It will take a return to the full message of the gospel, with its theme of restoration. Basically, Lyons says, the gospel is that we are made in God’s image, can be reconciled from sin through Jesus, and can join with him in working for the return of creation to its fullest potential.
Only then, Lyons says, can outreach efforts be more than a sales technique. Neighbors aren’t merely prospects; they are valued creations of God to whom we are to show unconditional love. This love, partnered with grace and acceptance, will naturally lead people to seek God. Acts of restoration will raise questions to which the only answer is the gospel. Other aspects of Christianity, what Lyons calls “second things,” will come to have their proper perspective.
There is much of worth in what Lyons has to say. I’m not as ready as he to write off what’s been done over the last century, but some of that is a question of age, I’m afraid. I remembering giving a class when I was in my late 20s and having a dear friend who was twice my age say, “I’m not convicted by this.” I was a bit taken aback, for I wasn’t really seeking to convict him with my words. Sometimes as the younger generation expresses their desire for a new level of excellence, the older generations can’t but hear that as a personal criticism.
Tomorrow I’ll try and wrap up this series with an overall review of the book and some links to further resources. Meanwhile, what are your thoughts about what Lyons has to share?