Tag Archives: church buildings

Why do we worry about buildings?

cathedralOK, so I’m talking about church buildings becoming less prominent in the future as Christians move to smaller gatherings. Then Ed Stetzer publishes research showing that megachurches continue to grow in number. The annoying thing about Ed is that he doesn’t just make assertions; he has statistics to back it up.

Even so, I think we need to remember something very important: most human organizations lose their original purpose. Some quickly, some not so quickly, but most change their initial goals for one common to such groups: survival. It’s easy for our focus to be on continuing existence of our group. That’s especially true for a congregation.

We need to be careful that we want to reach younger generations so that they will come to a saving relationship with God. It’s not about keeping our lights turned on. It’s not about having a place for us to meet when we get old. We want to reach out (be it to young people, Hispanics, or bank presidents) so that people will hear the good news of salvation.

If we’re not careful, the fact that “this congregation has been here for over 70 years” takes precedence over the question of whether the congregation is serving the Kingdom or not. If the congregation’s focus becomes survival, maybe it’s time to let others take its place.

So why do we have a building? There can be a number of reasons: having a place where a large number of us can worship together, having a place for outreach effort, having space for educational activities for our kids, having a unifying location. But our continuing as a congregation and maintaining a common piece of property have to be secondary to the good of the Kingdom. We need to seek his Kingdom and righteousness. When that’s our goal, the rest will be worked out, be it in a large building or in scattered house churches.

 

photo from MorgueFile.com

No Edifice Complex Here

cathedralWhy do I think that younger generations won’t continue the tradition of large church buildings? I have several generalizations to offer that lead me to that opinion. (Remember that generalizations are nothing more than that. I have a dog that climbs trees and sometimes purrs when she’s happy. She’s still a dog, just doesn’t always act like one)

  • Younger generations don’t like to give money to abstractions. What I mean is, they are generous, at times (though some studies suggest that each successive generation is less generous). But they want to give their money to specific things. Build a house. Dig a well. Buy some medicine. And they want to choose exactly how their money is used. Dropping it into a collection plate so that the electric bill can be paid doesn’t motivate them.
  • Younger generations don’t tend to be joiners. At least not of traditional organizations. They don’t want to be a member of an association; they want to be part of a posse. A posse forms, does its thing and disbands. No long time obligations. No hierarchy. Join, function, leave.
  • Younger generations don’t trust the recent past. What they see around them is evidence of failure: economic disparities, hunger, sickness, war. They respect the ancient past, but not what modernism has done with it. As the saying goes, they want Jesus, but not the church.
  • Younger generations tend to be pragmatic. A big building is wasteful. It’s much more practical to use the homes that we already own, or to use coffee shops, restaurants and bars, rather than construct a monument to inefficiency.

Those are some of the things that I see. Help me expand the list, or point out to me where I missed the boat. What attitudes do you see among people under 40 that will affect the future of the church building as we know it?

 

photo from MorgueFile.com

Will big church buildings become dinosaurs?

cathedralThe future of the church, specifically churches of Christ, has been a popular topic recently. I guess it’s always a popular topic, but articles detailing different aspects of our present and future realities seem to come in spurts. A lot is being said these days about what is happening with younger generations and what will become of the church.

I’ve been talking with a number of people about the future of church buildings. I’m optimistic about the future of the church; less so when it comes to buildings.

Back in January, Thom Rainer wrote a piece called The Death of the Mall and the Future of Church Buildings. It echoed a lot of the things that I’m seeing and hearing.

Rainer referred to an article about the decline of shopping malls and forecasts of what is to come for them. Rainer then said:

The Boomer generation has been the generation of bigness and sprawl. Their parents, in the aftermath of World War II, moved numbers of them to the new and massive suburbia. Large malls would soon follow. Most large megachurch buildings were constructed primarily for the favor of the Boomers.
But the children of the Boomers, Generation X and, even more, the Millennials, have been pushing for more intimacy and smallness. They triggered the unprecedented growth of Starbucks. They have been the key movers in social media, which has fostered a new online intimacy.
Among the Christian Millennials there is a desire for greater intimacy in church. They are in many ways triggering a new small group revolution. And though they may not have an explicit aversion to large church facilities, neither are they attracted to them.

There is a generation that sees big buildings as a plus and small buildings as a hindrance. And there is a generation that sees things just the other way around. Rainer notes:

A Boomer church leader looks at a small building and limited acreage and sees challenges. He sees the limitations of size and space. A Millennial leader looks at the same building and acreage and sees opportunity. He immediately thinks multiple venues, multiple services, and multiple days.

And he ends his article with a line that I hadn’t heard before: “After all, only college football stadiums are utilized less than church facilities.”

So what do you think? Are big church buildings destined to become a thing of the past? If so, will that be a bad thing or a good thing?

 

photo from MorgueFile.com