Tag Archives: Communion meditation

Communion meditation: What the law couldn’t do

There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death. For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.” (Romans 8:1-4)
The Law given in the Old Testament was holy, righteous and good, according to Paul (Romans 7:12). In fact, it only had one weak point: man. It was our humanness, our “flesh” as the Bible states it. The Law is holy, but I am flesh, unable to do what the Law asks of me. Only through the power of the Spirit of God can I overcome that flesh, yet I still find myself falling short of perfection.
Our God knows this. As the Psalmist says “he remembers that we are dust” (Psalm 103:14). Because of that, he sent his Son, who, by power of a perfect life, was able to condemn sin through his death. Those of us that choose to accept his sacrifice are freed from the necessity of paying for our sins through our own sacrifice.
His body was given, and we remember it in the bread. His blood was shed, a covenant established, and we remember that through the cup. Freedom from condemnation was brought to us, to condemnable man, and we remember that in this memorial meal.

Communion meditation: The Crux of the Matter

Throughout church history, men have debated the hows, whys, whens, whos and whats of the Lord’s Supper. Is it every Sunday? Is it Sunday only? Unleavened bread? Fermented or unfermented wine/grape juice? One cup or many? Closed communion or open? Can we sing or must there be silence? Can women pass out the trays? Can unbaptized boys pass out the trays? Can there also be a meal? Should there be a time of confession first?
Isn’t it interesting that what we spend so much time fighting about, the Bible says nothing about? More than twenty New Testament letters and only one has any correctives about the Lord’s Supper. And we rarely if ever talk about what Paul was actually addressing in 1 Corinthians 11.
When Paul did address the problems in Corinth, the main thing he did was to remind them of the original purpose of the Supper: remembering Jesus’ death and proclaiming its meaning until he come again. Let’s not lose sight of that as we bicker and quarrel over that which falls within the realm of the unspoken in the Bible:
For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.” (1 Corinthians 11:23-26)

Communion meditation: Eating and drinking in the presence of God

Then Moses and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel went up, and they saw the God of Israel. There was under his feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness. And he did not lay his hand on the chief men of the people of Israel; they beheld God, and ate and drank.” (Exodus 24:9-11)
It’s one of those incredible moments, a mountaintop experience, if you’ll pardon the pun. Humans, mere mortals, are allowed to climb Mount Sinai and eat and drink in the presence of God. They “beheld God,” in whatever sense that phrase is meant. I don’t think they saw God’s face as it were. Not long after this Moses asks to see God’s glory and is only allowed to see God’s back, which suggests that these men did not directly look upon God. Still, it was a special moment.
Not long before, Moses had presented the book of the covenant to the people, and they had pledged to obey the covenant (a promise which didn’t even last six weeks). As a sign of the covenant going into effect, Moses sprinkled the people with blood from a sacrifice, saying “This is the blood of the covenant,” the very words which Jesus used when he established the Lord’s Supper. There is a direct and intentional connection between this passage in Exodus 24 and the memorial meal which Jesus established.
The book of Deuteronomy speaks of God’s people eating “in the presence of the Lord” (12:7, 18; 14:23, 26; 15:20). That was a key aspect of the fellowship offerings which were offered on a regular basis.
As we join together at the table of the Lord, we experience a moment of “extreme fellowship,” if you will. Eating together joins us together, but it also joins us to the Lord. He is here with us. It is his table, and we are guests at it. We eat and drink in the presence of the Lord. There is horizontal fellowship and there is vertical fellowship. We eat this covenant meal, celebrating the pact that binds us to God and him to us. We commit ourselves to fulfill our part of the covenant, knowing that God is a faithful God who will always live up to his part of the agreement. In celebration of that covenant, we now eat and drink in the presence of our God.

Communion meditation: The new covenant

Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the LORD. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” (Jeremiah 31:31-34)
I don’t think much about the concept of covenant, yet it’s a concept that is at the heart of the Lord’s Supper. All four accounts of the establishment of the Supper record that Jesus spoke of the cup as being the new covenant in his blood. Did the apostles think of Jeremiah 31 when they heard those words? Possibly, for Jeremiah spoke of the day when God would “make the covenant new,” when the law of the covenant would be written on the hearts of men. Rather than being physically sprinkled with the blood of the covenant, we are symbolically washed in the blood of Jesus as we accept the responsibilities of the new covenant.
As we share in the covenant meal, we make public our acceptance of the covenant that God has offered. We remember the sacrifice that brought the covenant into effect and we pledge ourselves to loyalty to the God who purchased our salvation through the death of his son. We are now his and he is our God. We have all come to know God and to be known by him. Having received forgiveness and cleansing from God, we commit ourselves to live lives of service to him.
The bread and the wine that we take are our covenant meal, the celebration of the pact that God has offered us and that we have joyfully accepted.

Communion meditation: A man went free

Now at the feast he used to release for them one prisoner for whom they asked. And among the rebels in prison, who had committed murder in the insurrection, there was a man called Barabbas. And the crowd came up and began to ask Pilate to do as he usually did for them. And he answered them, saying, “Do you want me to release for you the King of the Jews?” For he perceived that it was out of envy that the chief priests had delivered him up. But the chief priests stirred up the crowd to have him release for them Barabbas instead. And Pilate again said to them, “Then what shall I do with the man you call the King of the Jews?” And they cried out again, “Crucify him.” And Pilate said to them, “Why, what evil has he done?” But they shouted all the more, “Crucify him.” So Pilate, wishing to satisfy the crowd, released for them Barabbas, and having scourged Jesus, he delivered him to be crucified.” (Mark 15:6-15)
A man went free the day He died. Thief. Terrorist. Killer.
A man went free the day He died. Barabbas’ name is interesting. “Bar” means “son of” and “abbas” comes from the word for father. “Son of his father” would be one translation. The name itself shows us the universality of his role. He stood there and represented every son of every father.
A man went free the day He died. A guilty man. One who, under Roman law, deserved the punishment that Christ received. His was an unexpected and undeserved reprieve.
A man went free the day He died. The guilty went free. The innocent was killed. The Holy One died, while the sinner lived. One man paid the price He never owed, one had his debt erased. The day Christ died another man received freedom and life, mercy and grace, liberty and forgiveness.
A man went free the day He died. And I AM THAT MAN.
Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his stripes we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.” (Isaiah 53:4-6)