Tag Archives: false teachers

Canon and false teachers in the 1st century

We’re spending some time these days talking about how the canon of the Bible was identified. I want to talk a little about what went on during the first century. During the first century, more than being concerned about what writings were scriptural, the church was focused on what teachings were inspired. Through the apostles and prophets, God was communicating messages to His church. They didn’t have the New Testament in written form; there were certainly congregations that didn’t even have the Old Testament writings. They were receiving teachings orally.

For the most part, it came to be recognized that the apostles taught with authority. From what we see in the book of Acts, that was somewhat relative. The Jews in chapter 11 had no problem in challenging Peter. The meeting in Acts 15 showed respect to the apostles, but didn’t concede them the right to decree on the question at hand. Yet, we can tell that their teachings carried weight.

I’m convinced that God used miracles to confirm the teachings of the apostles. I’ve discussed that theory before and won’t go into it again. Let’s just say that one of the ways the church could tell that someone had been in the presence of the apostles was by the miracles that they did.

God used the church itself as a control on teachers and prophets. There are numerous commands to weigh teachings and examine prophecies. 1 Corinthians 14 describes the process in a bit more detail. False teachers and false prophets were common in the ancient world (unlike today… ha!), and the church was not exempt from their influence.

The writers of the New Testament didn’t write with an awareness that they were writing Scripture. They certainly wouldn’t have laid their teachings alongside the Torah, for example. Yet Paul could quote Luke and call it Scripture, and Peter could refer to Paul’s writings along with “the other scriptures.”

Their was a concern about counterfeit messages, writings sent in the name of the apostles that weren’t really from them. The concept of authorship was a bit different in the ancient world. People saw nothing wrong in someone writing the teachings of another person and ascribing that person’s name to it. If I admire Will Rogers, for example, I could write a book of what I see to be his views and put his name on it. That was accepted in the ancient world. Unfortunately, people sent out messages in the name of Paul, for example, that never came from him. He seemed to take some steps to prevent that, adding unique touches to his letters that were to give them a mark of authenticity. (2 Thessalonians 3:17)

The question of which writings of the apostles and church leaders were to be considered as scripture was principally a question for a later age. In the first century, the focus was on the authenticity of the teaching.

Again, this isn’t an area that I consider myself to have much expertise. I welcome any and all educated insights.

The letter to Ephesus: A love lost

lettersThe Ephesian church was told by Paul in Acts 20 that they would be troubled by false teachers, some of them arising from within the church itself. Paul wrote to Timothy (who was ministering in Ephesus) and spoke to him time and again about the false teachers that were and would be attacking the church (1 Timothy 1:3; 4:1; 6:3-5; 6:20-21; 2 Timothy 2:14-17; 3:1-5; 3:12-13; 4:3-4). Apparently the church paid attention, for Jesus lauds them for their resistance to false teaching. But he has a criticism. In Letters From The Lamb I wrote:

Jesus recognizes that the Ephesian church is a hardworking, faithful church, yet he accuses them of having abandoned their first love. It seems that in their zeal to oppose false teaching, they had forgotten all about the foundation of their faith, which is love. Paul had encouraged these very Ephesians to live “speaking the truth in love.” Apparently they focused on “speaking the truth” and forgot about the love. They had protected the gospel, but had failed to protect those to whom the gospel was addressed. They had lost sight of the very core of the message of Christ.

(Letters From The Lamb, p.51)

Without love, the truth ceases to be truth. Without truth, there can be no true love. We need both. We must resist false teachers, but never at the expense of love.

Jesus warned the Ephesians that they were about to lose their lampstand. In Revelation, the lampstands represent the churches; if Jesus removes their lampstand, it means they are no longer his church. We can be hardworking guardians of doctrine like the Ephesian church, but if we lose our love, we lose our right to be called a church of Christ. Christ’s church is a community of love. If that doesn’t define us, we’ve lost our right to exist.