Tag Archives: peace

Moral legacy of war

There’s an interesting book that’s being written, called “The Moral Legacy of World War II.” It’s being written by Ted Grimsrud, who teaches theology and peace studies at Eastern Mennonite University in Harrisonburg, VA. He is posting rough drafts of each chapter on the web. You can see the table of contents here, with links to the chapters that have been made public.

It’s an interesting topic. While the impact of the war on society as a whole is interesting, I’m particularly aware of the impact on the church in the United States. Our fellowship, the churches of Christ, transformed almost overnight from a predominantly pacifistic movement to a movement that broadly supports military involvement.

I overstated my case the other day by saying that this country has basically been at war for the last 70 years. Nick rightly corrected me on this. If you want to get technical, the last declaration of war by the United States Congress was in 1942, when the U.S. declared war on Romania. What may have seemed like wars since then have merely been military actions. What is unquestionable, however, is that the U.S. geared up militarily in the 1940s and never “geared down” after that. We became, and remain, a militarized society. And our churches, the churches of Christ at least, became and remain a militarized religious movement.

So Grimsrud’s study should be interesting. I’ve only read the first chapter. I hope some of you will read his writings and comment on them. His bias is obvious, which can often be helpful. Studies done under a pretense of objectivity can be deceiving. Every story has a slant, and it’s useful to know ahead of time what that slant is going to be.

Deadly mirage

It came out in a paper in the U.K. last month. I didn’t see much coverage here, but I thought the news to be rather significant. Let me quote a couple of paragraphs from the article:

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, codenamed Curveball by German and American intelligence officials who dealt with his claims, has told the Guardian that he fabricated tales of mobile bioweapons trucks and clandestine factories in an attempt to bring down the Saddam Hussein regime, from which he had fled in 1995.

“Maybe I was right, maybe I was not right,” he said. “They gave me this chance. I had the chance to fabricate something to topple the regime. I and my sons are proud of that and we are proud that we were the reason to give Iraq the margin of democracy.”

How many times will history have to repeat itself before we are convinced? When humans go to war, we don’t have all the facts. The citizens, those called upon to lay down their lives, don’t have all the facts. In this case, even those calling for war didn’t have the correct information.

I continue to marvel that people who complain about putting their tax dollars in the hands of the government seem so willing to put the lives of their sons and daughters in the very same hands. We don’t trust them with our money, but we trust them with our children.

Even when time and time again we find out that what we thought we knew about the reasons for fighting turns out to be a mirage. A deadly mirage.

Wars are fought on lies and deceit. I for one want to have no part of it.

Good money after bad

$720 million a day. That’s what the American Friends Service Committee estimated as the cost of the Iraq war. That finding was published in September 2007; I doubt it’s exactly the same today. And we have to admit that the Quakers have an anti-war bias. But I don’t expect them to be grossly dishonest with numbers, even to support their views.

The Washington Post article that reported the finding stated, “The $720 million figure breaks down into $280 million a day from Iraq war supplementary funding bills passed by Congress, plus $440 million daily in incurred, but unpaid, long-term costs.”

Some accept that figure as the cost of “doing business” in the modern world.

Me, I can’t help but wish that Caesar put my tax dollars to better use.

The Night The Music Died

Today marks the 30th anniversary of the death of John Lennon. I shared some thoughts about his passing in an article I wrote for our blog at HopeForLife.org (it’s also on Heartlight). I won’t repeat those thoughts, though I invite you to read them on those sites.

Lennon’s most famous song, at least as a soloist, is probably the song “Imagine.” It’s a beautiful song, though I think the message is completely misguided. Lennon says that people need to ignore the transcendental and live the moment; I argue that the world has been doing that for millennia. We need a better awareness of the eternal, which will help us live the present in a more meaningful way.

One song that I hope gets played a lot and especially gets heard is the song “Give Peace A Chance.” I’m hoping that the world, especially the country I live in, will seriously consider this song. We’ve tried war as the solution to everything for far too long. It’s time we gave peace a chance.

What comes to mind when you think of John Lennon?

They will no longer train for war…

They will beat their swords into plowshares
and their spears into pruning hooks.
Nation will not take up sword against nation,
nor will they train for war anymore.  (Isaiah 2:4)

A while back, I posted about the U.S. involvement in the Soviet-Afghan war, how ex-government officials have admitted to funding Islamic extremists in order to suck the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan. We knew that their 10-year war in Afghanistan would destroy their economy and eventually bring down the Soviet Union. (We didn’t realize how much we would suffer for funding these Islamic extremists. Fortunes of war and all that…)

The U.S. involvement in Afghanistan is at 9 years and counting. While fighting that war, we also began another war in Iraq. And everyone says, “I wonder why our economy is in such bad shape.”

Admittedly, the U.S. has often found war to be profitable. But at some point, a nation that continually chooses war over peace will suffer the consequences.

If I didn’t oppose war from a Christian point of view, I’d be forced to oppose it from a logical point of view.