Tag Archives: Politics

What Christians DON’T have to say to a political world

Having looked in broad terms at the sort of things we are called to speak out about, what about the things we aren’t called to address? That is, when speaking as ambassadors of God, as representatives of the Kingdom of God, what issues just don’t fit?

We don’t seek our own personal good. That should be obvious, but it needs to be said. We can’t base our discourse on what benefits us personally. We don’t seek our rights, having been called to follow in the steps of Jesus, who gave up his rights. We don’t speak out for economic prosperity. We don’t advocate personal security. We don’t seek the opposite of those things, but issues of personal benefit do not shape our public speech.

While we pray for the peace and prosperity of our nation (and all nations), we don’t speak our for what is best for any nation of this world, be it the United States or be it China. That’s not our goal. That’s not what we’re here for. We speak as God’s ambassadors. We represent the good of his Kingdom, not that of any earthly nation.

Above all, we do not mold our message to meet political ends. The shameful example of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association should remind us all of that danger. We let our religious beliefs shape our political beliefs and not vice versa.

What else? Am I off base on any of this? Or have I left something out?

What Christians have to say to a political world

OK, so the other day I wrote about speaking from outside the system, the unique posture that Christians can have when they refuse to align themselves with political parties or candidates and merely speak on behalf of the Kingdom of God.

If you think about it, that’s quite a responsibility. As ambassadors of God, we have to choose our words carefully (something that I’m admittedly bad at). We also need to choose our subjects carefully. What sort of things do we speak out about?

Part of that depends on who our audience is. Our speech differs when addressing believers, that is, people who present themselves as trying to follow God. John the Baptist challenged Herod on his improper marriage, yet we have no record of Christians challenging the Roman authorities on similar issues. Herod presented himself as a Jew. Paul did speak to Felix about such things, though it was in private meetings.

Believers are held to a higher standard, at all levels of the political process. Both elected officials and voters are to hold to biblical principles at all times. This is especially true as regards their personal lives and behavior.

But what about politicians and government in general? What helps us decide when to speak out and when to let the “dead bury the dead” (let the world deal with problems of this world)?

I say that we are to speak in favor of values that reflect the nature of God. An emphasis on principles like truth and life. A defense of justice, particularly towards the weakest of society: widows, orphans, foreigners and the poor.

I think we need to immerse ourselves in the prophets, learning from men like Isaiah, Amos and Malachi about the things that God wants addressed. Our situation won’t be the same, yet we can learn the principles that matter to God, like mercy and justice. From God’s messages to foreign nations, we can learn about what standards even non-believers are expected to live up to.

We can’t expect political platforms to set the proper agenda for our speech. Whether or not an issue will impact an election does not determine our choice to address it. We must step outside the process and stand for values that transcend parties and elections, speaking eternal truths to a world focused on temporal problems.

Those are some initial thoughts. What are your suggestions? How do we speak out, not as Americans nor Democrats/Republicans, but as Christians?

Speaking from outside the system

In the past, I’ve argued that the proper position for Christians regarding politics is not to throw themselves into the fray, but to speak to it from outside. The analogy that I’ve used is that a referee can’t also be a player for one of the teams. Once we align ourselves with one candidate or another, we lose our right to speak out on individual issues.

This was illustrated for me a few years ago when I referred to an article by Brian Mclaren, only to have someone say, “I’m not interested in what he has to say; he supported Obama.” While I don’t agree with that reaction, I don’t think it’s uncommon. James McCarty wrote about reasons why young people are leaving churches of Christ; one main reason cited was the way the church has chosen to align itself with the political right. We gain nothing from politicizing the church and lose much by doing so.

That being said, I’ve realized that my stance toward political issues has been too passive. I’ve spoken out on some things, yet don’t feel that I’m doing my part in “speaking from outside the system.” As an ambassador of the Kingdom of God, I have the responsibility to speak out on behalf of things that interest my Kingdom. As political parties wrangle for votes and power, it’s my (our) responsibility to speak up on behalf of larger issues.

I’m trying to figure out exactly what that would look like. I’m well aware that the things I write here aren’t going to resonate much beyond a small circle of friends. Yet I feel that I need to speak out, if only for my own sake. I need to think through some of these things and voice my opinion.

I’ve got some travel coming up over the next few weeks, so the writing may be a bit hit and miss. But I want to address some of the core values that I think need to be addressed, values that Christians should stand up for, values that governments and politicians should be held accountable to.

Good men doing something

We’re taking time this week with a much-repeated phrase: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

In the context of conservative churches, this saying has become a dangerous inducement to abandon Christian principles in the name of “doing something” about evil. All of that love your enemy, don’t seek revenge, wait on the Lord stuff just doesn’t cut it. Christian men need to do something about evil. With their tongues. With their fists. With their guns. Otherwise… well, you know what the quote says.

And yes, the Bible says we are here to serve and not to lord it over others. Says that we are citizens of heaven and not of this world. But we have to do something about evil! With our tongues. With our e-mails. With our vote. Otherwise… well, you know what the quote says.

What about things like non-violent resistance? What about denouncing injustice from outside the system? What about overcoming evil with good rather than answering it with evil? What about prayer? Nope. Sorry. Not good enough.

What about having the patience to let the Lord act? What about fighting evil empires with the same weapons the early Christians did? No way! If you haven’t noticed, they got thrown to the lions.

When we lay aside the fruit of the Spirit and embrace the works of the flesh, what do we think is really going on? Does that somehow become spiritual when done for a “good reason”?

When good men are induced to fight evil with evil, the result is still evil, no matter the initial justification. When we throw away the Kingdom’s armor and take up the world’s weapons, the triumph belongs to the world and not the Kingdom.

All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to use evil’s tools to try and defeat it.

Photo by Konrad Baranski

Good men doing nothing

I’m wanting to spend some time this week with a much-repeated phrase: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” I mentioned yesterday that the quote has been used ad nauseum to promote this action or that one (often conflicting actions, with both sides claiming to be the “good” side). I say that not in condemnation of the quote, but as justification for spending several days looking at it.

While I’m still unconvinced of the worth of the saying itself, I will admit what others have said: much of my angst in this situation comes from the misuse of this quote, particularly by Christians. Vern commented yesterday: “It’s probably better to limit the quote to the political/social arena and not apply it at all to the living of Christians.” Much of my distress comes from the fact that the “all that is necessary” saying is frequently used to move Christians into the political/social arena! The quote is used to say, “If you aren’t active in this arena, you aren’t doing anything.”

And, in the midst of our prolonged back and forth, Nick made a couple of key statements:

However, (and I’m certain Tim will talk about this later in the week), the quote is rarely used to criticize people who are, in fact, doing *nothing*. Literally, truly, nothing.

It is used to criticize people who aren’t following the quoter’s recommended course of action. Ask any pacifist how often they’ve been rhetorically bludgeoned with this quote. Anyone who thinks that pacifism (or even QUIETISM, for crying out loud) is doing nothing has a painfully shallow view of spiritual warfare.

Sometimes, doing nothing is precisely what is necessary for one person. But that’s completely different from the idea that all men and women made good by the blood of the cross and the power of the Spirit should choose to do nothing against the forces of evil.


What I look forward to in the coming days is the shredding of the assumptions typically driving its use. Not a call to ACTION, but a call to a specific – typically nationalist – course of action. Actually, I find that is isn’t typically used as a call to action at all, but as a pejorative against indirect action, compassionate responses, and non-violence.

Nick could see where I was headed with some of this. Tying in with yesterday’s post, I want to talk about the idea that “merely” praying is “doing nothing.” (Just typing the phrase “merely praying” makes me gag a bit) That’s definitely our culture talking. Dan Bouchelle posted something the other day, quoting an African Christian who said, “You Americans sure can sing, but you don’t know much about how to pray.”

In general, we don’t believe in the power of prayer. I saw an extreme of this a few years ago. I was participating in a Church of Christ Internet group, and one member wrote something like: “We pray because God commanded us to. We know that it’s not going to change anything.” Wow! How sad.

Those who don’t believe in the power of prayer will often use phrases like “sit around singing Kum Ba Yah.” Don’t know why that poor song carries the brunt of their wrath, but it’s come to characterize someone who believes that God can and will intervene in this world… even if it’s not in the way we would want.

Maybe that’s why I’m troubled by the lack of God in this quote. It feeds that worldly mindset that says, “If I don’t do it, it won’t get done. God certainly isn’t going to do anything.”

Prayer is doing something. It is action. The problem is, relying on prayer takes more courage than most of us have. It requires a loss of control. It requires patience… some prayers in the Bible weren’t answered for decades. Decades! It requires us to accept God’s plans, rather than stepping forward and shaping our own story.

Prayer is not the only action Christians should take against evil. But it is by far the most significant. When someone says, “All we can do is pray,” it doesn’t mean all hope is gone. It means that we still have our greatest weapon.

All that is required for the triumph of evil is for good men to stop relying on God’s power.